that was the year that was

I have just finished gathering and collating my papers for presentation to my tax accountant in the morning.  It's hard work for me; I'm not a numbers person. I like words, as you might have guessed. The interesting thing for me was reliving 2016.  The time was so packed that last spring seems longer ago than a mere year. It's another milestone. I used to wonder what I'd do without deadlines or milestones but they never seem to stop so neither do I.

I play another game you might be familiar with: what have you learned?  What have you learned since you were 60 (older?)?  What have you learned this week?  What did you learn today? Oh dear. If I confess to you what I learned today, promise not to laugh. I finally learned the value of the program called MINT.  I poked at it kind of half-heartedly over the last year, missing two or three months entirely. But today I found it useful to find transactions quickly.  I promised myself that I would not fail to report to MINT regularly.

 So that's good.

a robin and a rose

I've mentioned Robert Benchley before, quite recently, I think, one of the founding members of the lunch group who met at the Algonquin Hotel in the 30s.  I liked his low-key, even self-denigrating humour and I still remember bits of it.  I think of him every spring when I start to plant the back 40 (my balcony), not because he was an expert gardener but because he knew even less than I do, and I find that comforting.  He said all he knew of nature was a robin and a rose.  Me, too, but a little more, a very little.  I know lilacs and love them. And irises and orchids.  When I say I know them, you understand I recognise them by name. I don't know how to grow them.  I learned something about hibiscus, which I also love, when I was in the South Pacific last year and saw how huge they grow.  They do very well with a rainy season.  And now my little homebodies do well too because when I water them I pretend I'm a rain forest and they like that. I can manage water. I have a friend who loves orchids, I mean , she loooves orchids. She gave me an orchid plant once and offered to show me how to look after it.  After a two-hour lecture with demonstrations, I was awestruck and also gob-smacked. They're out of my league.

I have recently been reading a number of books by English writers and they all amaze me with their knowledge of plants. They're not even gardening or nature books, well, one of them is, sort of - Robert Macfarlane's Landmarks which I loved and pored over for the language more than for the landscapes, and The Old Ways which is really about walking trails (ways) but is loaded with plants. Most recently. I read Margaret Drabble's The Dark Flood Rises and it's full of plants.  How do they know so much?

That, of course, leads me gloomily on to a sad realisation of  how much I don't know.  I know almost nothing of the constellations. Ditto geology.  i have never understood machines. I finally saw how a car engine works, literally in a child's book that had a double-page spread of the workings of the motor with simple explanation; a perfume atomiser goes puff.puff and squirts gas (the fuel) that fires the engine.  Something like that. My son tells me I'm computer illiterate and he's right.  A computer is to me a glorified typewriter and I learn its many, varied services with constant gratitude and awe. Right now this one is telling me it's going to sleep unless I plug it into a power outlet. That happens to me, too.

Anon, anon.