a prophet in her own land?

I had a peculiar thing happen last night that hasn’t happened for a long time but for a different reason. I was at dinner at a neighbour’s (J) with one other neighbour  when J said she had recently read an essay of mine in a book, the first Dropped Threads collection, and she was gob-smacked (not her word but she was).  She said here was this person she swam with, her neighbour, well known to her, yet who wrote this piece she had trouble getting her head around – not because it was that difficult but that it was so strange – that I had written it, I guess. and out of the context of the me that she was familiar with.

I have subsided into anonymity, not without resentment – not of my neighbour but of editors and publishers and people who should know better and who should realize that I am still here, inside my head where I always was.

I remember shortly after Bill had died and I had started publishing some stuff, trying to make a living for me and my kids, my brother-in-law (Bill’s sister’s husband) commented on my incipient career (he didn’t call it that) saying, “I knew you were smart, Bettyjane, but I never thought you were that smart.”

It’s because I am female.  As a teenage girl I learned very quickly that I shouldn’t be smarter than a boy.  It damaged me. I got so used to hiding my light under a bushel that it became second nature. I rarely had to ratchet up a few degrees of higher intelligence and when I did inappropriately, I usually had my figurative knuckles smartly rapped

.I met a new friend on my theatre tour in January who surprised me with a quick appraisal.  “It must have been difficult for you, “she said, “hiding how smart you really were.”  Shows how smart she is. 

I have to stop hiding. Age is doing it for me now.

Oscars, so white?   The world, so masculine.  The world, so young

when it’s good it’s very very good but when it’s bad it is horrid

I  tried for a long time yesterday to cut and paste that piece about new-fangled punctuation marks complete with illustrations of the marks but I couldn’t get the marks to come through.  I don know what to do.  I’ll search for the source of the article.

It wasn’t the only frustrating run-in I had with computer technology yesterday. How maddening it is, and how time-consuming!  It isn’t always my fault, either, though I am quick to acknowledge that it may be.   Different programmers operate in different ways and you have to be on their wavelength before you pass.  And then there are the endearing glitches that one’s own computer develops; for example, mine won’t accept the deletion of an email address when a friend changes hers.  I have several recipients now to whom I must send a message to two, sometimes three, addresses in the hope that she will receive one. The daemon mailer sends one back but I can’t tell which one. Don’t tell me, it won’t do any good. I have a short-term memory for these things.

On top of that, other people have their problems.  Yesterday I nagged a company for an overdue payment of funds owing o me.  Guess what?  They’ve lost my invoice, please send it again.  Think I can find it?  Oh dear.

And all I want to do is hunker down – no, up, with my injured leg raised while I work, so I must be at the laptop and not the desktop – hunker up and be creative.

The source of hunkers, BTW, is probably the old Scottish word, haunches, so down is probably the right direction to use with it. My use of it means I must apply myself seriously to a task.  I love the word task and I love my task.

So that’s all for now, folks, techie gods willing.