what's cooking?

I consider myself a pretty good cook, somewhat knowledgeable, willing to try new ingredients, methods, and maybe some small appliances (like a spiralizer) but not too expensive these days. For example, I will never do sous-vide, but my son has, so I know about it.

It began when I got married. I liked liver; my husband did not. He agreed to eat liver if I cooked it twelve different ways. I had no idea there were twelve ways to cook liver. I owned one cookbook. The Betty Crocker Cookbook was my kitchen bible, with pictures. It taught me how to make bread, and meet loaf and brownies and chilli con carne, but only one way. I went to the library and began to study cookbooks. (Very methodical, always a student.) I cooked liver twelve different ways, including liver soufflé. I didn’t know soufflés were supposed to be difficult. Amazingly, mine rose. I found methods and results that i liked better than the one I knew. It doesn’t help now. It’s hard to get calves’ liver in a store. I order provimi liver when I find it in a good restaurant.

The other condition that made me a cook was my writing. I needed a place to work so I I turned the dining area in my first few homes into a writing space. Without a dining table I had to be innovative with the food I offered to guests. I used TV tables and they wobbled under pressure so I couldn’t serve meat that required strenuous cutting. I experimented with casseroles and interesting combinations. When I say experimented, I don’t mean I made things up, but I got pretty good at ad libbing. By the time we had an entire separate dining room, I was committed to exploration. We couldn’t afford to travel so I discovered other countries and lifestyles in my kitchen.

I like variety. I like to learn: new ideas, words, recipes, whatever. I made a quiche Lorraine when I thought it was just an onion pie. I made paella before I learned how to pronounce it. When I took over our family Christmas dinner, I never knew what we were having until the December issue of Gourmet magazine was published. And of course I had to learn what to do with my sometimes esoteric leftovers, hence my specialty, a necessity, I might add, because I couldn’t afford to throw out food. No one can or should.

So even though I live alone with a tighter budget than in the past, I still like to try new tastes and creative combinations of food. I’ve reached my limits, though. Here’s a brief review of a new cookbook that will show you how daunted I am.

Titled “Simple: Effortless Food, Big Flavors” by Diana Henry, the book is distinguished not only by the number of recipes but also by their originality, “particularly in the creativity of her ingredient combinations.” She seasons with Kashmiri chiles, saffron, grape must and tamarind (I use saffron); she garnishes with pomegranate seeds, fresh mint, dill and parsley (okay, I’m good with those) and “drizzled with prodigious amounts of sour yogurt, her flavor pairings are intelligently conceived without being pretentious.”

The review cites a few recipes: Sweet Potatoes with Yogurt and Cilantro Sauce; Breton Tuna and White Bean Gratin; Lamb Chops with Dates, Feta, Sumac and Tahini. I pass.

i said I used to travel in my kitchen, yes, to Greece and Scandinavia and of course to France. But here’s another new cookbook that you need a visa for as well as a passport: “Taste of Persia: A Cook’s Travels Through Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Iran and Kurdistan” by Naomi Duguid.

I won’t be going there.

tschotschkes

My father called them jollies. They’re little things, usually not expensive, quite small, amusing, useful or appropriate. They’re not presents or gifts. They are just meant to “jolly life along.”” Heaven knows we all need to be jollied along.

I have a gift drawer, several, in fact, where I keep jollies (presents, too) that I collect for people, and give away as the year progresses, not only  easily to people I see regularly but  also to people at a stamp’s distance. The hard part is that stamps proliferate — postage is very expensive these days. I keep remembering that Marshall McLuhan reminded us that we should be grateful that have a million dollar service at our disposal for pennies (more than that!) , a service that used to be available only to powerful or wealthy people and even then — I mean, look at Romeo and Juliet. The private mail service went horribly awry and look what happened.

So I buy really light, flat things that can fit in an envelope and travel cheap. Sometimes I stamp on a parcel to flatten it so that it will fit the slot they test it on. 

That’s not what I wanted to talk about. I was talking about buying jollies and I drifted into a tangent. Well …. so…jollies. No --- prices. I went to a high end gift store. Galleries and museums have marvellous jollies, very innovative, and I’m willing to pay for an idea. But improvements or solutions to problems I have been familiar with for a long time and have long since solved in some way or the other, without great expense, no way.

I found a strawberry huller and a tomato corer. Half a century ago I had a strawberry huller, a little tin pincer that clipped the green leaves from the centre on top of the strawberry. I think it cost about a dollar (loonies were far in the future). I had it for years buf it’s gone now. I have a small knife so I don’t need another huller, certainly not like the one in the gift store, a large tool about the length of my palm with a vicious knife shaped to cut out the top and centre of a strawberry. It costs $10.95. I pass. The tomato corer was bigger, with a triangular, cone-lilke blade to cut out the core of a tomato. I think it was $14,95. Nope.

But it got me thinking, sending me off on another tangent. Strawberries and tomatoes (and other things) don’t grow the way they used to. They have deeper cores, harder centres, more stems and leaves to be removed than they used to. I don’t know what to say about that or what to do about it, but I know I’m not going to buy an expensive gadget to remove the evidence. That’s not jolly at all.

Besides, where would I put it/them?